Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics ; (12): 529-533, 2018.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-689594

ABSTRACT

This article reports the results of tandem mass spectrometry and the mutation features of the ETFDH gene for an infant with multiple acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency. The results of tandem mass spectrometry showed that C14 : 1, C8, C6, C10, and C12 increased. Exon sequencing was performed on this infant and his parents and revealed double heterozygous mutations in the ETFDH gene of the infant: c.992A>T and c.1450T>C. The former was inherited from his mother, and the latter was inherited from his father. c.1450T>C was shown to be the pathogenic mutation in the HGMD database. PolyPhen2, SIFT, and PROVEAN all predicted that the novel mutation c.992A>T might be pathogenic, and the mutant amino acids were highly conserved across various species. The findings expand the mutation spectrum of the ETFDH gene, and provide molecular evidence for the etiological diagnosis of the patient with multiple acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency as well as for the genetic counseling and prenatal diagnosis in the family.


Subject(s)
Humans , Infant, Newborn , Male , Base Sequence , Electron-Transferring Flavoproteins , Genetics , Exons , Iron-Sulfur Proteins , Genetics , Multiple Acyl Coenzyme A Dehydrogenase Deficiency , Genetics , Mutation , Oxidoreductases Acting on CH-NH Group Donors , Genetics
2.
Chinese Journal of Medical Genetics ; (6): 91-94, 2013.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-232197

ABSTRACT

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To identify the origin of human small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMCs) using fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) combined with G-banding karyotype analysis, and to discuss their mechanisms of formation and research value.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Cep-FISH and SubcenM-FISH were used to analyze sSMCs in 3 patients for whom the result of G-banding was 47,XN,+mar.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The FISH result of case 1 was 47,XY,+mar.ish inv dup(22)(q11.1)(D22Z4++,D14/22Z1+, RP11-172D7-). The marker has formed exclusively by heterochromatin. A boy was delivered later with no apparent clinical abnormalities. The FISH result of case 2 was 47,XX,+mar.ish r(10)(p11.2q11.2) (cep10+, RP11-232C13+, RP11-178A10+)[25]/46,XX[10]. The marker has formed by heterochromatin and nearby centromere. A girl was delivered later with no clinical abnormalities. The FISH result of case 3 was 47,XY,+mar.ish inv dup(22)(q11.1)(D22Z4+,D14/22Z1+). The marker has also formed exclusively by euchromatin. Fetal abnormalities were detected by type B ultrasonography, but were not necessarily related with the marker.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>The diversity of sSMCs has posed a great challenge for prenatal diagnosis. Identification of sSMCs will require combined karyotype analysis and FISH or other molecular techniques such as microarray based comparative genomic hybridization or sequencing. For its specific structure, the sSMCs may also provide a valuable tool for gene mapping, heterochromatin research and gene therapy.</p>


Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Male , Pregnancy , Chromosome Aberrations , Classification , Chromosome Banding , Genetic Markers , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Karyotyping , Prenatal Diagnosis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL